aggimajera's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[Tinkle Time]

The run cycle for her looked genuine, her facial animation was expressive, and the sound design was stellar. You actually spooked the hell out me. My one drawback is to get rid of that title card or shorten it.

[IphoneXs bot Vs /v/egazord.]

Damn fine combination sequence and great message about tech: everyone loses.

[Pot Stop #1]

Not bad. Given as how I don't go to these things I maybe don't get the joke so much. But animation though reflects the content and the voice work is appropriately corny.

JunkYardAnimations responds:

I respect and appreciate the honest review. and haha ya, maybe I helped give a feel for how these dispensaries are :'D

[Anna's GrassHopper]

Experimental as this is, you posted this on the wrong site buddy.

[Mario Fails Collab!!]

I myself am typically too much of a fan of pixel animation. This was, however, charming to watch. Well executed idea, audio was fitting, and its productions values were high overall. Nice work.

[Cradle Robber]

What in the absolute f*** did I just watch. You're a genius, that went in a completely different direction than I ever could have guessed. Great animation, and funny as hell.

[Reina Scully goes to Best Buy]

Okay, the podcast was entertaining enough for me to stick around to the end. The artwork reminds me of a more primitive Cox n' Crendor with a cooler color palette. What that means is you are shooting for a cartoon style that aids the audio by utilizing artwork emphasizing expression over movement or actual animation.

The one problem you are at right now: you're just getting started it seems. The execution of your style is, at the moment, a tad rudimentary. The actual animation here is lacking because that wasn't the point, I assume. But you do seem to have basic understanding of appropriate posture and facial expression during conversation. That's a good place to start.

In the future I hope to see you actually get some proper movement involved in your videos. Or, if you stick with this for a while, make it more pleasing to the eye, exaggerated, and crisp. One of the things that makes these kinds of animations work is exaggeration and humor of the visuals. You'll get there.

[REM Flight]

The scenario was simple and the methods you used to capture the speed and essence of the MC's flight worked. The entire flight scenario was very well done. The art style was consistent and satisfactory.

My only complaints are with the audio. Much less work was put into that than in the visuals and nothing about it really seemed to pop. I recommend that you find some assistance with that next time.

Fair animation man. Please continue!

[UshikkoSukimiEP1EP2]

Art style was solid and consistent. Animation quality was crisp and smooth. And the characters and humor were well thought out and executed.

The cloud looked a little rough and some moments comedic timing was a *tad* off. I felt the “You gotta he kidding me” was unnecessary. But not enough to detract.

Great work to all involved.
Hope to see more in the future.

[The Sewer Mishaps]

For an animation made on your phone, I give you props. That said, for such simplistic visuals its usually beneficial to have more exaggerated movements and motions. It felt slow and stiff.

My own little 2 cents also is if you wanna cut away to do text cards, have the text be a little more old school or cartoony instead of straightforward. Same as the movement: more exaggerated and fun.

MisterWoolley responds:

Thank you and Thank you for your advice. :)
My phone is my only method of animating and I can't wait to try actual characters with color.